70 Free Spins No Deposit No Wager: How the UK Bonus Market Got Here
The phrase "70 free spins no deposit no wager" sounds like a marketing promise from 2026. In truth, it is the end point of a 20-year argument between regulators, operators and players about who pays for a free bet. The number 70 is arbitrary. The "no wager" part is not. That single condition rewrote how UK casinos price risk.
This is a retrospective. We trace the bonus from the 2005 Gambling Act through to the 2026 landscape, using real operators like Bet365, MrQ, PlayOJO and 888 Casino as markers along the way. No hype. Just the mechanics, the arithmetic and the regulatory paperwork that turned a throwaway promotion into a compliance document.
If you have ever wondered why a 70-spin offer with no wagering is rarer than a 70-spin offer with 40x playthrough, the answer sits in about a decade of rule changes, tax adjustments and player-behaviour data. It is a story about margins. The UK remote gaming duty has stood at 21% since April 2022, and that number does more to shape a bonus than any marketing team ever will.
What Did the UK Bonus Market Look Like Before 2005?
Before the Gambling Act 2005 came into force on 1 September 2007, online casino bonuses lived in a grey zone. Bookmakers were legal on the high street, but internet casino games were not clearly regulated. Operators ran offshore, usually from Gibraltar or the Isle of Man, and bonuses were generous because nobody was counting.
A typical 2004 offer might have been 100% match up to £100 with a 20x wagering requirement on the bonus only. Sounds tame now. In practice, players could clear it on low-house-edge games like blackjack, which meant the operator's expected margin on the bonus was close to zero. Free money, essentially, funded by the deposit.
The 2005 Act changed the frame. It created the Gambling Commission, moved licensing onshore in spirit, and introduced the concept that operators had to be socially responsible. Nobody in 2007 was talking about no-wager spins. The conversation was about whether a £50 sign-up bonus with 10x playthrough was "fair and open" under the new licensing conditions.
Why Did Early Bonuses Use Wagering Requirements at All?
Wagering requirements exist because a bonus without one is a straight cash gift. The operator needs the player to generate enough turnover to cover the cost. If a casino gives £10 in bonus and the games return 96% RTP, the player needs to wager roughly £250 to hand back £10 in house edge. That is the maths behind a 25x requirement.
In the pre-2007 era, operators set these numbers by feel. A 20x requirement on slots was normal, and 10x on table games was common. Nobody published the expected loss to the player. The Gambling Commission's later guidance on fair terms, published in 2014 and tightened in 2018, forced operators to state the real cost of a bonus in plain English.
That regulatory pressure is the direct ancestor of the no-wager format. If you cannot hide the playthrough, some operators reasoned, why not remove it entirely and use the absence as a selling point? MrQ was one of the first UK brands to build its whole identity on that idea when it launched in 2018.
How Did the 2014 and 2018 Rule Changes Reshape Bonuses?
The 2014 Gambling Commission guidance on bonuses and promotions was the first serious attempt to standardise the small print. It required operators to make significant conditions prominent, to avoid terms that were "unfair" and to give players a clear route out. Before this, a 70-spin offer might hide a 40x wagering requirement in clause 14 of a terms page.
Then came 2018, when the Commission published its consolidated unfair terms guidance alongside the CMA's enforcement action against several operators. The Competition and Markets Authority ran a specific investigation into online casino and betting bonuses between 2016 and 2018. The result was a set of principles: no misleading playthrough, no unfair withdrawal restrictions, no hidden maximum win caps on bonus funds.
For players, the practical effect was that a "70 free spins no deposit" offer suddenly had to say, in the headline, whether winnings were cash or bonus. If they were bonus, it had to state the playthrough. If there was a cap on winnings, it had to be visible. The era of the buried 100x requirement effectively ended.
What Did the CMA Investigation Actually Change?
The CMA's 2018 enforcement work resulted in formal undertakings from a group of major operators, including William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral, Paddy Power, Betfred and Sky Bet. Each agreed to change how bonus terms were presented. The undertakings covered sign-up offers, free spins and deposit bonuses.
Specific changes included a ban on requiring players to play with their own money before bonus funds, clearer rules on when a bonus expires, and the removal of terms that let operators cancel winnings if a player had "exploited" a promotion. That last clause had been used to void payouts on no-deposit offers, which is exactly the sort of offer we are discussing.
By 2019, the phrase "no wagering" had moved from niche to mainstream. MrQ, PlayOJO, Casumo and 888 Casino all leaned into it. PlayOJO, in particular, built its entire UK marketing around "no wagering, no maximum win, no bull". The 70-spin no-deposit no-wager format is a direct descendant of that positioning.
Why Is 70 the Magic Number for Free Spins?
There is no regulatory reason for 70 spins. The number is a marketing convention, and its origins are economic. A free spin on a typical 96% RTP slot with a £0.10 stake has an expected return to the player of about £0.096. Seventy spins at that stake represents roughly £7 of expected value.
That £7 figure is important. It sits below the threshold where a no-deposit offer attracts professional bonus abusers in volume, but above the threshold where a casual player feels the offer is worth claiming. Operators have tested 10, 20, 50, 70 and 100 spins over the years. The 50-100 band is where sign-up conversion peaks, and 70 has become a common midpoint.
Stake size matters more than spin count. A 70-spin offer at £0.10 per spin is worth less than a 50-spin offer at £0.20. The headline number is a decoy. What you actually get is spins × stake × RTP. Seventy spins at £0.10 on a 96% slot returns about £6.72 in expected value, before any wagering is applied.
How Do You Calculate the Real Value of 70 Spins?
Take the spin count, multiply by the stake, then multiply by the game's published return-to-player percentage. That gives the expected return. If the offer is no-wager, that expected return is what you keep on average. If the offer has 40x wagering on winnings, you need to subtract the expected house edge generated by the playthrough.
Example. Seventy spins at £0.10 on a 96% slot gives £6.72 expected return. A 40x wagering requirement on that £6.72 means £268.80 of playthrough. At 96% RTP, the expected loss on that turnover is £10.75. The player's expected net value is negative. That is the arithmetic that makes no-wager offers genuinely different.
This is why operators who offer no-wager spins tend to cap the maximum win. A £6.72 expected return with a £50 maximum win cap is a reasonable risk. Without a cap, the tail risk on a single lucky player hitting a 5,000x slot win on a free spin can be significant. Always read the cap before you claim.
Which UK Operators Offer 70 Free Spins No Deposit No Wager in 2026?
The honest answer is: fewer than you would think. A genuine no-deposit, no-wager 70-spin offer is expensive for the operator, and most UK-licensed brands now prefer deposit-based no-wager offers. That said, several operators run 70-spin no-deposit promotions on a rotating basis, often tied to new game launches or seasonal campaigns.
Below is a comparison of UK-licensed operators that have run 70-spin no-deposit or no-wager promotions in the 2025-2026 period, with the terms as they typically appear. Terms change frequently, so treat this as a historical snapshot rather than a live offer sheet.
| Operator | Typical Offer | Wagering | Max Win Cap | Licence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MrQ | Up to 70 spins on selected slots | None | Usually £50 | UKGC |
| PlayOJO | 50-80 spins, no wagering | None | No cap on winnings | UKGC |
| 888 Casino | 70 spins on selected slots | None on winnings | £100 | UKGC |
| Casumo | 30-70 spins, deposit-linked | None on spins | £50 | UKGC |
| Mr Vegas | 70 spins on selected slots | None | £50 | UKGC |
| Betfred | 50-70 spins, no-deposit | None | £30 | UKGC |
| Gala Bingo | 70 spins on selected slots | None | £50 | UKGC |
| Foxy Bingo | 70 spins on selected slots | None | £50 | UKGC |
Note the pattern. The maximum win cap is almost always present. That is the operator's insurance policy. A no-wager offer without a cap is essentially a lottery ticket, and the operator's risk team will not sign off on it at scale. Where a brand does advertise "no maximum win", like PlayOJO, the spin count or stake is usually lower to compensate.
The other pattern is that the 70-spin no-deposit no-wager offer is rarely a permanent fixture. It appears during new game launches, often tied to a specific Pragmatic Play, NetEnt or Hacksaw Gaming release. MrQ has run 70-spin campaigns on Pragmatic titles. 888 Casino has run them on NetEnt slots. Mr Vegas has leaned on Hacksaw releases.
Which Brands Are Most Reliable for No-Wager Spins?
Reliability here means the offer actually pays out and the terms are clear. On that measure, MrQ, PlayOJO and Casumo have the strongest track record. All three have built their UK positioning around no-wager bonuses, and all three have been through the CMA-era transparency rules without major public disputes over bonus terms.
888 Casino and Mr Vegas are close behind. Both run regular 70-spin promotions, both cap winnings at a reasonable level, and both publish the playthrough (or absence of it) in the headline. Betfred and Gala Bingo are more traditional operators, but they have adapted their bonus terms to the post-2018 environment.
Brands like William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral and Paddy Power tend to favour deposit-based no-wager offers rather than no-deposit spins. That is a commercial choice, not a compliance one. The no-deposit model is expensive to run at scale, and the larger operators prefer to spend their acquisition budget on matched deposits where the player's own money is at stake.
How Did the 2020 Gambling Act Review Change the Bonus Landscape?
The 2020 Gambling Act Review was the UK government's wide-ranging look at the 2005 Act. It ran from December 2020 and produced a white paper in April 2023. The white paper set out a series of proposals, many of which have been implemented through Gambling Commission consultations between 2023 and 2025.
The most relevant change for bonuses was the tightening of rules around "financial risk checks" and the treatment of promotional offers. The Commission's 2024 consultations introduced stricter requirements on how bonuses are marketed, including clearer disclosure of the real cost of wagering. For no-wager offers, the effect was mostly positive: they became easier to advertise because there was less to disclose.
The white paper also pushed operators toward "safer" bonus design. That has meant shorter expiry windows on free spins, typically 7 days rather than 30, and clearer rules on what happens to winnings if a player self-excludes mid-promotion. Free spin winnings on a no-wager offer are usually credited as cash, but the expiry is often 7 days from the spin date.
What Do the 2024-2026 Commission Consultations Mean for Spins?
The Commission's consultations in 2024 and 2025 focused on three areas relevant to spins: the treatment of bonus funds in affordability checks, the transparency of maximum win caps, and the marketing of "free" in offers that require a deposit. The last point is the one that catches most players out.
A 70-spin offer described as "free" but requiring a £10 deposit is not free. The Commission has been clear that "free" should mean free. That has pushed operators toward either genuinely no-deposit offers or clearer labelling like "70 spins when you deposit £10". The distinction matters for your wallet.
The 2025-2026 environment is also shaped by the statutory levy on operators, introduced to fund research, prevention and treatment. The levy adds to operator costs, which in turn makes no-deposit offers more expensive to run. Expect the 70-spin no-deposit no-wager format to remain a promotional tool rather than a permanent fixture.
How Do No-Wager Spins Actually Work Mechanically?
A no-wager spin is a spin whose winnings are paid as cash, not bonus. That is the whole distinction. When you claim 70 no-wager spins, you spin the reels, and whatever you win is credited to your cash balance. You can withdraw it immediately, subject to the operator's minimum withdrawal threshold, usually £10.
The mechanics are simple, but the small print is where things get interesting. Most no-wager offers still include a maximum win cap, a spin expiry window, and a list of eligible games. The cap is usually £50 or £100. The expiry is usually 7 days. The eligible games are usually a specific set of slots from one or two providers.
Compare that to a wagered spin. With 70 spins at 40x wagering, your winnings land as bonus funds. You must play through 40 times the bonus amount before withdrawing. If you win £7 from the spins, you need to wager £280. At 96% RTP, that playthrough costs about £11.20 in expected value. You started with £7 of expected value. The maths is not in your favour.
What Happens to Your Winnings on a No-Wager Spin?
They become cash. That is the short answer. The longer answer is that they become cash subject to the operator's withdrawal rules. If the maximum win cap is £50 and you win £200 on a single spin, you keep £50. The rest is removed by the terms. That is the trade-off for the absence of wagering.
Some operators apply a "pending" period before cash winnings from spins become withdrawable. This is usually 24 to 72 hours for anti-fraud checks. MrQ and PlayOJO tend to process quickly. Larger operators like William Hill and Ladbrokes may take longer because of their legacy banking systems.
The key thing to check is whether the cap applies per spin, per offer, or per player. A per-spin cap of £50 is generous. A per-offer cap of £50 means the total you can win across all 70 spins is £50. Read the terms. The difference is significant.
What Is the Real Expected Value of a 70-Spin No-Wager Offer?
Let us do the arithmetic properly. Seventy spins at £0.10 stake on a 96% RTP slot gives an expected return of £6.72. If the offer is genuinely no-wager with no cap, that £6.72 is your expected cash value. If there is a £50 cap, the expected value is slightly lower because the cap truncates the upside tail.
How much lower? That depends on the volatility of the slot. A high-volatility Pragmatic Play title like Sweet Bonanza has a long tail of large wins. Capping at £50 removes some of that tail, reducing expected value by perhaps 5-10%. A low-volatility NetEnt slot like Starburst has a shorter tail, so the cap matters less.
For comparison, a 70-spin offer with 40x wagering and no cap has an expected value of roughly negative £4, based on the calculation in the earlier section. The no-wager version is worth about £6.72. The difference between the two formats is more than £10 in expected value. That is the entire argument for no-wager offers in one number.
| Offer Type | Spin Count | Stake | Wagering | Expected Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No-wager, no cap | 70 | £0.10 | None | +£6.72 |
| No-wager, £50 cap | 70 | £0.10 | None | +£6.00 approx |
| 40x wagering, no cap | 70 | £0.10 | 40x | -£4.00 approx |
| 20x wagering, no cap | 70 | £0.10 | 20x | +£1.50 approx |
These are expected values, not guarantees. In any single session, you might win nothing or win the cap. The expected value tells you what the offer is worth on average across many claims. It is the right way to compare offers, and it is the calculation the operator's risk team runs before signing off on the promotion.
Which Game Providers Dominate No-Wager Spin Offers?
Pragmatic Play is the dominant provider for no-wager spin promotions in the UK. Its slots are widely licensed, its RTP configurations are transparent, and its volatility range suits both small-stake spins and headline-grabbing maximum wins. MrQ, 888 Casino and Mr Vegas all run 70-spin campaigns on Pragmatic titles.
NetEnt is the second most common. Its slots, particularly Starburst and Gonzo's Quest, have been staples of free spin offers since the format emerged. NetEnt's RTP is typically 96% or higher, which makes the expected value calculation straightforward. Gala Bingo and Foxy Bingo have run 70-spin offers on NetEnt games.
Hacksaw Gaming has become more prominent since 2022. Its high-volatility titles suit operators who want a headline maximum win, and its UK licensing is solid. Mr Vegas and Casumo have both used Hacksaw releases for spin promotions. Microgaming and Evolution titles appear less often in no-deposit offers because their RTP and volatility profiles are less suited to small-stake spins.
Why Does Provider Choice Affect the Value of Your Spins?
RTP and volatility are the two variables. A 96% RTP slot returns £0.096 per £0.10 spin on average. A 94% RTP slot returns £0.094. Across 70 spins, that 2% difference is £0.14. Small, but it adds up when you are comparing offers. Always check the RTP of the eligible games before claiming.
Volatility matters more for the cap. A high-volatility slot has a longer tail, so a £50 cap removes more of the expected value. A low-volatility slot has a shorter tail, so the cap matters less. If you have a choice of eligible games, a medium-volatility slot with 96% RTP is usually the sweet spot for a capped no-wager offer.
Provider licensing also matters. All UK-licensed operators must use games from providers that hold a UK licence or operate under the operator's licence. Pragmatic, NetEnt, Hacksaw, Microgaming and Evolution all hold UK licences. If an offer lists a game from an unlicensed provider, that is a red flag.
How Has Player Behaviour Changed Since No-Wager Offers Emerged?
The shift toward no-wager offers has changed how players evaluate promotions. In the wagering era, players focused on the headline bonus amount. A £100 bonus sounded better than a £50 bonus, even if the £100 came with 40x wagering and the £50 came with none. That was the operator's intent.
Since 2018, players have become more sophisticated. The no-wager format has trained a generation of UK players to look at the playthrough first and the headline number second. That is a genuine behavioural shift, and it has pushed operators to compete on terms rather than on headline figures. MrQ and PlayOJO benefited most from this shift.
The data supports the shift. Operators that moved to no-wager models reported higher player retention and lower bonus abuse rates. The no-wager offer attracts casual players who value simplicity, and it deters the professional bonus hunters who used to exploit wagered offers. That is a better commercial outcome for the operator, even if the headline offer looks smaller.
Do No-Wager Offers Attract Different Player Demographics?
They tend to attract older players and less experienced players. The simplicity of "win £7, keep £7" is easier to understand than "win £7, wager £280, keep the remainder". That simplicity is worth a lot to a player who has never claimed a casino bonus before. It also reduces the volume of customer support queries about bonus terms.
Younger players, particularly those who have grown up with mobile-first products, tend to prefer the clarity of no-wager offers too. The wagering model feels like a trick to them. That perception is a marketing problem for operators still running 40x requirements, and it is one reason why the wagering model is slowly losing ground.
The demographic shift is not universal. High-stakes players and table game specialists still gravitate toward wagered offers because the playthrough can be cleared on low-house-edge games. But for the mass market of casual slot players, no-wager is now the default expectation. That is a significant change from 2015.
What Are the Red Flags in a 70-Spin No-Wager Offer?
The first red flag is a maximum win cap that is not stated in the headline. If the offer says "70 free spins, no wagering" and the cap is buried in clause 12, that is a problem. The CMA-era rules require significant conditions to be prominent. A cap is significant. It should be visible.
The second red flag is a short expiry window that is not clearly disclosed. A 7-day expiry is common and reasonable. A 24-hour expiry on a no-wager offer is not. If you cannot claim and use the spins within the window, the offer is worth less than the headline suggests.
The third red flag is a list of eligible games that excludes the highest-RTP titles. If the only eligible game is a 92% RTP slot, the expected value of your 70 spins drops to about £6.44. That is still positive, but it is lower than the headline suggests. Check the eligible games before you claim.
How Do You Verify an Operator's Licence Before Claiming?
The Gambling Commission publishes a public register of licensed operators. You can search by trading name on the Commission's website. Every UK-licensed operator displays its licence number in the footer of its site. Cross-check the number against the register. It takes about 30 seconds.
Licence checks matter because they determine your recourse if something goes wrong. A UK-licensed operator is subject to the Commission's complaints process and, ultimately, to the independent adjudicator. An offshore operator is not. If a no-wager offer from an offshore brand looks too good to be true, it probably is.
Some offshore operators do hold licences from other jurisdictions, such as the Malta Gaming Authority or the Gibraltar Licensing Authority. Those licences have their own protections, but they are not the same as a UK licence. If you are a UK player, the UK licence is the one that matters for dispute resolution.
How Does the 2026 Landscape Compare to 2015?
In 2015, the typical UK casino welcome offer was a 100% match up to £200 with 30x wagering. No-deposit spins existed but were usually 10 or 20 spins at £0.10 with 40x wagering on winnings. The no-wager format was a niche product offered by a handful of brands, mostly smaller operators trying to differentiate.
In 2026, the typical welcome offer is either a deposit-based no-wager offer or a smaller match with clearer terms. The 70-spin no-deposit no-wager format sits at the premium end of the market. It is offered by brands that have built their identity around transparency, and it is priced accordingly with caps and expiry windows.
The regulatory environment has also changed. The 2005 Act has been supplemented by the 2023 white paper, the 2024-2025 consultations and the statutory levy. Operators face higher compliance costs, which makes generous no-deposit offers more expensive to run. The 2026 market is more transparent but also more conservative than the 2015 market.
What Will the Next Five Years Look Like for Bonus Offers?
Expect more no-wager offers, not fewer. The commercial logic favours them. They attract casual players, reduce bonus abuse and simplify compliance. The main constraint is cost, and the statutory levy will push that cost higher. Operators will respond by capping winnings more tightly and shortening expiry windows.
The 70-spin format will likely remain a promotional tool rather than a permanent fixture. It will appear during new game launches, seasonal campaigns and operator anniversaries. The brands that run it most reliably, MrQ, PlayOJO and Casumo, will continue to lead on no-wager positioning. Larger operators will follow, slowly.
The wildcard is regulatory change. If the Commission tightens rules on maximum win caps or on the marketing of "free" offers, the economics of no-deposit spins could shift again. That is the lesson of the last 20 years: the bonus format follows the regulation, not the other way around.
Responsible Gambling: What You Need to Know
Gambling in the UK is legal for adults aged 18 and over. If you are under 18, you cannot claim any of the offers discussed in this article. Age verification is required by every UK-licensed operator, and it is enforced at the point of withdrawal as well as at registration.
If gambling is causing you harm, help is available. The National Gambling Helpline is operated by GamCare and is free to call on 0808 8020 133, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. GamCare also offers online chat and face-to-face support across the UK. You do not need to be in crisis to use the service.
Every UK-licensed operator must offer a self-exclusion facility. GAMSTOP is the national self-exclusion register, and registering with it prevents you from accessing gambling services from all UK-licensed operators for a minimum of 6 months. You can register at gamstop.co.uk. It is free, and it covers online casino, bingo and sports betting sites.
Deposit limits, loss limits and session time reminders are available on every UK-licensed site. Use them. A 70-spin no-wager offer is a small-value promotion, but the habit of setting limits before you play is worth more than any bonus. If you are claiming offers to chase losses, stop and call the helpline.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are 70 free spins no deposit no wager offers genuinely free?
Yes, if the offer is genuinely no-deposit. You claim the spins without paying anything, and any winnings are paid as cash. The catch is usually a maximum win cap, typically £50 or £100, and a short expiry window, usually 7 days. Check both before claiming.
What does "no wager" actually mean on a free spin offer?
It means the winnings from the spins are not subject to a playthrough requirement. You can withdraw them as cash, subject to the operator's minimum withdrawal threshold and any maximum win cap. A wagered offer, by contrast, requires you to play through the winnings multiple times before withdrawing.
Why do most 70-spin offers have a maximum win cap?
The cap is the operator's risk control. A no-wager offer without a cap exposes the operator to unlimited liability if a player hits a large win on a free spin. A £50 or £100 cap limits that liability to a manageable level. It is the trade-off for the absence of wagering.
Which UK operators are most reliable for no-wager spins?
MrQ, PlayOJO and Casumo have the strongest track record. All three have built their UK positioning around no-wager bonuses and have adapted to the post-2018 transparency rules without major disputes. 888 Casino and Mr Vegas are close behind, with regular 70-spin promotions on Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw titles.
How do I check if an operator is licensed by the Gambling Commission?
Search the operator's trading name on the Gambling Commission's public register. Every UK-licensed operator displays its licence number in the site footer. Cross-check the number against the register. It takes about 30 seconds and it determines your recourse if a dispute arises.
What is the expected value of 70 no-wager spins?
At £0.10 per spin on a 96% RTP slot, the expected return is about £6.72. A £50 maximum win cap reduces that slightly, to roughly £6.00, depending on the slot's volatility. A 40x wagering requirement on the same spins would produce a negative expected value of about £4.00.
Can I withdraw winnings from no-wager spins immediately?
Usually yes, subject to the operator's minimum withdrawal threshold, typically £10, and any anti-fraud pending period, typically 24 to 72 hours. Some operators process faster than others. MrQ and PlayOJO tend to be quick. Larger operators with legacy banking systems may take longer.
How did the 2018 CMA investigation change bonus terms?
The CMA's 2018 enforcement work resulted in formal undertakings from major operators including William Hill, Ladbrokes, Coral, Paddy Power, Betfred and Sky Bet. They agreed to make significant terms prominent, remove unfair withdrawal restrictions and stop using terms that let them void winnings on technicalities.
Are no-wager spins better than wagered spins?
For most casual players, yes. The expected value is positive rather than negative, and the terms are simpler to understand. For high-stakes players who can clear a playthrough on low-house-edge games, a wagered offer can occasionally be better. But for the mass market, no-wager wins on value and clarity.
What happens if I self-exclude while holding free spin winnings?
Under GAMSTOP and operator-level self-exclusion, your account is closed and any bonus or spin balance is usually forfeited. Cash winnings already credited may be returned, depending on the operator's terms. If you are considering self-exclusion, do it before claiming any offer, not after.
The Bottom Line on 70 Free Spins No Deposit No Wager
The 70-spin no-deposit no-wager offer is the product of two decades of regulatory pressure, commercial experimentation and player-behaviour data. It exists because the CMA and the Gambling Commission forced operators to be transparent about wagering, and because players responded by preferring the simpler format.
The number 70 is a marketing convention, not a regulatory requirement. The no-wager condition is the part that matters. It changes the expected value of the offer from negative to positive, and it changes the player's experience from a maths puzzle to a straightforward promotion. That is why it has survived and why it will likely continue.
If you claim one, check the maximum win cap, the expiry window and the eligible games. Verify the operator's UK licence. Set a deposit limit before you play. And if gambling stops being fun, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or register with GAMSTOP. The best bonus is the one you can walk away from.